
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the current issue of Pregnancy Magazine cross over the line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatdad.com/greatdadblog/2008/10/16/does-the-current-issue-of-pregnancy-magazine-cross-over-the-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatdad.com/greatdadblog/2008/10/16/does-the-current-issue-of-pregnancy-magazine-cross-over-the-line/</link>
	<description>Because dads don&#039;t always think like moms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.greatdad.com/greatdadblog/2008/10/16/does-the-current-issue-of-pregnancy-magazine-cross-over-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 07:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.greatdad.com/2008/10/16/does-the-current-issue-of-pregnancy-magazine-cross-over-the-line.html/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>It is a horrible picture. Those topless undershirts are amazing shirts (I&#039;ve gotten several myself when I&#039;m not pregnant) but are not meant to be worn on their own and I would be mad if I were the owner of Blush [ the topless undershirt] and my product was being worn like this on the COVER of a magazine.

Hellooooo!

Besides the fact that those are not her hands covering up her boobs. Its just a very awkward shot that has stewed some controversy. Pregnancy would have been wise to ask around before publishing this one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a horrible picture. Those topless undershirts are amazing shirts (I&#8217;ve gotten several myself when I&#8217;m not pregnant) but are not meant to be worn on their own and I would be mad if I were the owner of Blush [ the topless undershirt] and my product was being worn like this on the COVER of a magazine.</p>
<p>Hellooooo!</p>
<p>Besides the fact that those are not her hands covering up her boobs. Its just a very awkward shot that has stewed some controversy. Pregnancy would have been wise to ask around before publishing this one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.greatdad.com/greatdadblog/2008/10/16/does-the-current-issue-of-pregnancy-magazine-cross-over-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.greatdad.com/2008/10/16/does-the-current-issue-of-pregnancy-magazine-cross-over-the-line.html/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking, if this truly offends anyone, then they are just not that bright or interesting. It&#039;s not a crime to be a moron or dull but it&#039;s not a group of people I&#039;m going to worry about. I like the cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking, if this truly offends anyone, then they are just not that bright or interesting. It&#8217;s not a crime to be a moron or dull but it&#8217;s not a group of people I&#8217;m going to worry about. I like the cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

